Post by nijhumnishita033 on Jan 11, 2024 7:33:20 GMT
Sentences and the extremely restrictive interpretation that must be given to cases of material non-execution. The ruling refers to the socio-economic impact of the constructions, highlighting that “in this case, the Court itself refers to the existence of contradictory reports on the socio-economic impact that the execution would have in the municipalities of El Gordo and Berrocalejo and, valuing them, comes to recognize the limited impact that the execution would have in terms of job creation, and refers generically to the maintenance of the population in the nearby municipalities associated with the tourism generated by urbanization, benefits that They can hardly be imposed and considered disproportionately of greater scope .
Than the realization of the public interests protected and committed in the execution, such as urban planning and environmental protection, which would be definitively harmed, in the terms declared by the Phone Number Datasentences Phone Number Data that are executed, by maintaining and consolidating the canceled urban transformation.” On the other hand, it means that "initiatives of this nature for the development of an eco-tourism activity are well received, with the economic and social effects that they may have, which have been specified here in the contested order of June 30, 2020, this must not be “ at the expense of affecting interests that the Autonomous Legislator himself has considered to be of greater relevance, such as .
Territorial planning , to which is added what is established by the State, Community and Autonomous Legislator , in protection of interests that are also of greater protection, such as the environment” Municipality of Berrocalejo, one of those supposedly affected by the effects of the Valdecañas activity (Photo: España Rural) Regarding the allegation of possible economic damages that could arise for the administration, the resolution is based on what was resolved by the TC in its 2020 ruling, when it states that “« The Administration, when approving the PIR Marina Isla de Valdecañas, acted as if the protection of the land did not exist and decided to transform the land urbanistically as if it were land without any protection , adopting a decision outside the order or common way of acting.